What matters when building an AI-assisted time tracking evaluation group?
The size of the group is not what matters most in a successful evaluation. Active use is.
For the best results, we see firms engaging lawyers from different practice areas from the start. That gives the firm a broader view of how the tool works across different types of legal work.
The group should use the tool as part of their normal daily workflow throughout the agreed evaluation period. That gives you enough real experience and data to assess the results.
In our experience, active use is rarely the difficult part. Manual time recording is a common frustration, and many lawyers are happy to replace part of that work with a simpler, more automated workflow.
By the end of the evaluation, you should have both user feedback and enough real usage to compare the results with the business case agreed at the start.
If you need help on building an optimal pilot group, reach out to us.
